Legal Opinion

Coggins v. . Flythe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

From the judgment both parties appealed.

The facts are sufficiently stated by Associate Justice MacRae in the consideration of the several exceptions filed by the parties. This was an action upon the bond of Flythe, guardian of the relators, heard upon exceptions to the referee's report at April Term, 1892, of Northampton. It is proper to say that while the case comes up upon appeals of both plaintiffs and defendants from the judgment of his Honor JudgeBrown, the exceptions to be considered are from the rulings of MacRae,Judge, at a previous term of said court.

We will first consider the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Drake v. . DrakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Patton v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. McNeill v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Freeman v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. NationStar Mortg. LLC v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Roberts v. ScyphersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Estate of Langdon, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899
  5. Rich v. . MoriseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API