Coggins v. Flythe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Action on guardian bond of defendant Flythe, heard upon exceptions to referee’s report, at April Term, 1892, of NORTHAMPTON Superior Court. From the judgment both parties appealed. The facts are sufficiently stated by Associate Justice Mac-Rae in the consideration of the several exceptions filed by' the parties.
1Opinion of the Court
MacRae, J.:
This was an action upon the bond of Flythe, guardian of the relators, heard upon exceptions to the referee’s report at April Term, 1892, of Northampton Superior Court. It is proper to say that while the case comes, up upon appeals of both plaintiffs and defendants from the judgment of his Honor Judge Brown, the exceptions to be considered are from the rulings of MacRae, Judge, at a previous term of said Court.
We will first consider the plaintiffs’ appeal: Exceptions 1, 5, 6 and 7 involve the admissibility of the testimony of Jesse Flythe and William Grant, two of the defendants, *105bei…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Hinton v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Drake v. . DrakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Moore v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Patton v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuykendall v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- NationStar Mortg. LLC v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Roberts v. ScyphersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Estate of Langdon, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899