Legal Opinion

Credible Behavioral Health v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2019No. 19/19PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Credible Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Emmanuel Johnson, No. 19, September Term 2019. Opinion by Greene, J. APPEAL AND ERROR—JUDGE AS FACTFINDER BELOW Under Maryland Rule 7–131(f), the circuit court, when hearing an appeal on the record from the district court, reviews the district court’s factual determinations for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. CONTRACTS—CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION—GENERAL RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Under the promissory note at issue, employees are required to repay the loan in accordance with the repayment schedule in Paragraph 1(a) in both situations where an…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Cochran v. NorkunasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. In the Matter of Bernard L. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Impac Mortgage Hldgs. v. TimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Adventist Healthcare v. BehramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. State v. McGaghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API