Legal Opinion

Forker v. Pomponio

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 14, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 278 (1960)

158 A.2d 849

FRANCES M. FORKER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

FELIX POMPONIO AND FREDERICK RICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 15, 1960.

Decided March 14, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.

Mr. Frank M. Lario argued the cause for defendant and cross-claimant-appellant Pomponio (Mr. Joseph Pierce Lodge, attorney).

No appearance for plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. H. Hurlburt Tomlin appeared for defendant Rice (respondent on the appeal of the cross-claimant) but filed no brief and was not heard in oral…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sattelberger v. TelepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Reetz v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Owen v. George Cole Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mijon v. AcquaireNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Alterman v. JinksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Boomer v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Nilsen v. TriggFairfax County Circuit Court · 1994
  5. Nowak v. NowakConnecticut Superior Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API