Legal Opinion
Reetz v. Mansfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiffs filed in this court a plea to the jurisdiction, based upon the fact that the recognizance given by the defendant under the provisions of the Practice Book, § 335, for the prosecution of his appeal, as noted by the clerk of the City Court of Meriden, provides that the “plaintiff” shall prosecute the appeal to effect. There has also been filed in this court as a part of the appeal record, a document certified by the clerk and under the seal of the City Court of Meriden, showing that in that court the records had been amended to accord with the fact that the recognizance as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tyler v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Steinert v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Perrelli v. SavasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Straffus v. BarclayTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Cain v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Ritchie Ex Rel. Ritchie v. BurtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Plunkett v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Davey v. Pepperidge Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.