Legal Opinion
Haythorn v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 5, 1902No. 12,711PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*339The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J.:
• This was an action on a note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The defense was based upon the statute of limitations. To remove the bar, the following letter was relied on by the plaintiff:
“Belle Plains, Kan., September 13, 1894.
“The Chester County Banking and Trust Co., West Chester,Pa.:
“Gentlemen — I understand you own a mortgage of $3500 made by me and secured by lots 60, 62, and 64, in Mead’s addition to Wichita. This property, which cost me $15,500, is now said to be worth not over $1500. It is going to rack for want…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Pracht v. McNeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Gragg v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miles v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Durban v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Olatmanns v. GlennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Corbett v. HossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.