Legal Opinion

Haythorn v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1902No. 12,711PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*339The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J.:

• This was an action on a note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The defense was based upon the statute of limitations. To remove the bar, the following letter was relied on by the plaintiff:

“Belle Plains, Kan., September 13, 1894.
“The Chester County Banking and Trust Co., West Chester,Pa.:
“Gentlemen — I understand you own a mortgage of $3500 made by me and secured by lots 60, 62, and 64, in Mead’s addition to Wichita. This property, which cost me $15,500, is now said to be worth not over $1500. It is going to rack for want…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Pracht v. McNeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Gragg v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miles v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Durban v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Olatmanns v. GlennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Corbett v. HossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API