State ex rel. Graves v. Wiegand
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The question at. the bottom of this controversy is one of evidence. The lawyerlike stipulation entered into by both sides settles the facts so as to leave for consideration only the proper application of correct rules of evidence. Counsel for appellant has in a very commendable manner cleared the case of all confusion arising from disputed facts by resting his case on the proposition that the statute prescribing the mode of the return and preservation of the ballots is not directory but mandatory; that before the ballots can be used as evidence to impeach the result declared by the board of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Attorney-General ex rel. Bashford v. BarstowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- State ex rel. Symmonds v. BarnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Casey v. HetheringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Schuetz v. LuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Gradinjan v. BohoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Lanser v. KoconisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Clapp v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.