Legal Opinion

Clapp v. Joint School District No. 1

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The first question is whether the statutory remedy provided by sec. 6.66, Stats., is the exclusive method of contesting a school-district bond referendum when more than a recount is sought. Relying on Roberts v. Madison (1947), 250 Wis. 317, 27 N. W. (2d) 233, the plaintiffs argue a taxpayer has a right to enjoin the misapplication of public funds and the issuance of school bonds pursuant to an illegal referendum authorizing the bond issue constitutes such a misapplication. The plaintiffs further contend their objections go to the validity of the election, not its results, and consequently…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ollmann v. KowalewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Petition of AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State ex rel. Graves v. WiegandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Logerquist v. Nasewaupee CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Johnson v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. McNally v. TollanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Carlson v. Oconto County Board of CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Karker v. Board of Unified School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API