Clapp v. Joint School District No. 1
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The first question is whether the statutory remedy provided by sec. 6.66, Stats., is the exclusive method of contesting a school-district bond referendum when more than a recount is sought. Relying on Roberts v. Madison (1947), 250 Wis. 317, 27 N. W. (2d) 233, the plaintiffs argue a taxpayer has a right to enjoin the misapplication of public funds and the issuance of school bonds pursuant to an illegal referendum authorizing the bond issue constitutes such a misapplication. The plaintiffs further contend their objections go to the validity of the election, not its results, and consequently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Ollmann v. KowalewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Petition of AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State ex rel. Graves v. WiegandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Logerquist v. Nasewaupee CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Johnson v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- McNally v. TollanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Carlson v. Oconto County Board of CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Karker v. Board of Unified School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.