Legal Opinion

Gradinjan v. Boho

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues presented in this appeal are:

1. Did the respondent, Gradinjan, properly and timely appeal to the circuit court?

2. Were the three questioned ballots absentee ballots?

3. Is the provision of sec. 11.62, Stats., that absentee ballots not containing the name or initials of the issuing municipal clerk shall not be accepted or counted mandatory rather than directory?

Sec. 6.66 (3), Stats., provides:

“Within 5 days after the recount determination of said board, any candidate, or any elector who voted upon such constitutional amendment or proposition, as the case may be, aggrieved thereby may…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olson v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. La Follette v. KohleeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Frederick v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ollmann v. KowalewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Craig v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Education Network, Inc. v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lanser v. KoconisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Sturgis v. Town of Neenah Board of CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API