Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 6, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

900 A.2d 702 (2006)

2006 ME 80

STATE of Maine

v.

Hank WATSON. and

State of Maine

v.

Jonathan Blumberg.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Argued: November 14, 2005.

Decided: July 6, 2006.

R. Christopher Almy, District Attorney, C. Daniel Wood, Asst. Dist. Attorney (orally), Bangor, Evert N. Fowle, District Attorney, Alan Kelley, Deputy Dist. Atty. (orally), James G. Mitchell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Skowhegan, G. Steven Rowe, Attorney General, William R. Stokes, Asst. Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, (as amicus curiae), for State.

Charles E. Gilbert III, Esq. (orally), Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, Robert H.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Silver; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Calkins.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API