Legal Opinion

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Blackwell

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 20, 2007No. 1:03-cr-00063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This enforcement action filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) involves alleged insider trading in the stock of Worthington Foods, Inc. (“Worthington”). The SEC alleges that Defendant, Roger D. Blackwell (“Blackwell”), a director of Worthington, provided illegal tips to close friends and family members prior to the October 1, 1999 announcement that the Kellogg Company (“Kellogg”) had entered into an agreement to acquire Worthington. The SEC contends that these tips allowed the other…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ResnickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BravataDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GordonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MegalliDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API