Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gordon
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 2011No. 4:09-mj-00061PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 84). Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) argues that defendant George David Gordon is barred from relitigating issues that were conclusively decided in his criminal prosecution, and that the SEC is entitled to summary judgment under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Gordon responds that the issues resolved in his criminal case were not identical to the issues raised in this civil action, and that he did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate any…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MegalliDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mine Shaft BrewingDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023