Reagan v. Brissey
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
This appeal brings before us the question whether *155the Land Court judge erred in concluding that the plaintiffs do not hold an implied easement to use as parldands four parcels of land, to which the town of Oak Bluffs (town) holds tax title, subject to the individual defendants’ unforeclosed right of redemption. The plaintiffs also sought to permanently enjoin any sale of the parcels for residential development. We affirm the judgment denying them declaratory and injunctive relief.
1. The undisputed facts. We take the facts as the judge set them out in her detailed and comprehensive decision.3…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Attorney General v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Dale v. BedalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Prentiss v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Revere v. Boston/Logan Airport Associates, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Reagan v. BrisseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Well-Built Homes, Inc. v. ShusterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005