Well-Built Homes, Inc. v. Shuster
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
By a partial summary judgment of the Land Court, various aesthetic and architectural restrictions and a prohibition against further subdivision of lots in a residential development were held not to apply to two lots owned by the defendant Richard Shuster.1 We reverse the portion of the judgment that declared that a covenant to permit the imposition of future restrictions does not run with the land. As to the declaration that Richard’s lots are not subject to the restriction against further *620subdivision, we vacate that judgment and remand for further proceedings.
1. Facts. The undisputed facts,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Snow v. Van DamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Dittemore v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sullivan v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Murphy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- In Re Arcadia Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF WAYLAND & others v. MARILYN J. HEINRICH & others (and a companion case ).Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Blackstone Smithfield Corp. v. Town of BlackstoneMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.