Legal Opinion

State v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Indictment for refusing to allow an inspection of certain books containing a record of shipments and deliveries to consignees of intoxicating liquors in violation of Public Laws 1913, ch. 44, sec. 5.

It appeared that the defendant had such a book as the statute requires it to keep, and the relevant facts embodied in a special verdict and the proceedings thereon are as follows:

"We, the jurors sworn and impaneled in this case, return the following special verdict in this case, the defendant having agreed that a special verdict might be found:
"We find that R. L. Davis, on a date prior to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. BolenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Cummer v. PaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Thomas v. . SandlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . PerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API