State v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Indictment for refusing to allow an inspection of certain books containing a record of shipments and deliveries to consignees of intoxicating liquors in violation of Public Laws 1913, ch. 44, sec. 5.
It appeared that the defendant had such a book as the statute requires it to keep, and the relevant facts embodied in a special verdict and the proceedings thereon are as follows:
"We, the jurors sworn and impaneled in this case, return the following special verdict in this case, the defendant having agreed that a special verdict might be found:
"We find that R. L. Davis, on a date prior to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. BolenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Cummer v. PaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Thomas v. . SandlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. . PerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.