Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cummer v. Pace

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought on the relation of Arthur G. Cummer, a citizen of the City of Jacksonville, for the purpose of coercing the respondents as officials of said City to observe the provisions of Section 490 C. G. L., 424 R. G. S., by permitting the said relator, Arthur G. Cummer, in person and by his authorized agent, Paul R. Smoak, to make inspections from time to time, during regular office hours, of any and all the municipal records and books of account of the City of Jacksonville, Florida, as they may desire to so inspect in accordance with the statute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Mushet v. Department of Public ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Barrickman v. LymanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. News-Press Publishing Co. v. WisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Veale v. City of Boca RatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Douglas v. MichelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Morgan v. State ex rel. ShevinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. State, ex rel. Copeland v. Cartwright, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API