In re Carlisle Packing Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCushman, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above)..Unless the referee was authorized to re-examine and redetermine the questions decided by the Board of Tax Appeals, there is no necessity to examine questions other than those stated by claimant and already quoted.
Pertinent provisions of the law relating to the Board of Tax Appeals appear in 26 USCA §§ 1211 to 1228, inclusive. Section 1224, as amended (Revenue Act 1926, § 1001, as amended by Act June 6, 1932, § 1101 (a), 26 USCA § 1224), provides for a review of decisions of the Board by the Circuit Courts of Appeal and the Court of Appeals of the District…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. TugwellWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Ex parte CraigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Haynes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Montoya v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ClausDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1952