Legal Opinion
United States v. Claus
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1946No. Cr. No. 40407PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendant moved for a reduction of the sentence previously imposed upon him by this Court. The application has merit in view of the defendant’s physical condition resulting from a recent operation and the United States Attorney has consented to the granting of the. motion. It is necessary to decide whether the Court has power to consider the application.
Prior to the adoption of the new Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which became effective March 21, 1946, the district court could not entertain a motion for reduction of sentence after the term of court had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Perlman v. 322 West Seventy-Second Street Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Victory v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Hodge And ZweigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Hodge & ZweigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.