Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1952No. V-1477Published

1Opinion of the Court

r THEA NEYGENEIECAI. OF TEXAS Hon. Bascom Giles OplnIon No. V-1477 Commissioner General Land Office Re: nPerlod of litigation” Austin, Texas of Sun 011 Comoanv. et al Bumble Oil & Re- fSnkz Co ; et al, under Dear SW: Article 54211, V.C.S. You have requested our opinion on the follow- lng question concerning certain State leases~ on lands in Laguna Madre which were recently involved in liti- gation in Sun Oil Co,, et al v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., et ai.: ,--- “What Is the ‘period of lltigatlon’ in said case within the meaning of Article 54211, V.C.S., as amended by Section 1, Chafiter 406,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. R. Simpson & Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API