Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Manley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1935No. 25528. Department OnePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, C. J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution, and the only question — are a prosecuting attorney and the surety on his official bond liable in damages for acts done by the prosecuting attorney in the course of his official duty, if such acts are committed with malice and without probable cause? — for decision arises upon a demurrer to the complaint.

The gist of the cause of action alleged in the complaint is as follows: One Lundgren, a “game protector” in Grays Harbor county, was told by a volunteer informer that a deer was supposed to have been killed on September 9, 1933, and that it was at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kittler v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Semmes v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Creelman v. SvenningWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Janaszak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API