Legal Opinion

Creelman v. Svenning

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1966No. 37969PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— The question presented is whether there is any liability by the county and the state for a malicious prosecution by a prosecuting attorney.

For a speedy determination of that question, we make two assumptions: one, that the prosecutor has maliciously and without just cause prosecuted the plaintiff; second, that the position of the prosecutor is such that both the county and the state could be responsible for his tortious conduct.

We wish to make it clear, beyond question, that the first assumption involves a question of fact which has not been determined by any trier of the facts; and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Anderson v. ManleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mitchelle v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County v. BriggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API