Legal Opinion

George Dowdy, D/B/A Texas Sand & Gravel Company v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1959No. 17663PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Alleging that defendant was preventing him from proceeding with the performance of his contract with it for gravel excavation and fill, plaintiff brought this suit for an injunction against such interference or, in the alternative, for damages.

As set out in detail in his amended original complaint, plaintiff’s claim in summary was: that, responding to a letter of inquiry sent out by defendant, he had made a bid for placement of fill and purchase of gravel under the fill on defendant’s property; that, on the basis thereof, he had consummated a contract with defendant, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Barthel v. StammCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Copeland Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Edwin K. Atwood v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jose E. Baerga v. Elliot Richardson, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education AndwelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Robert Czeremcha v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Calkins v. City of FruitlandIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Schimpf v. GesslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Lone Star Motor Import, Inc. v. Citroen Cars CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API