Legal Opinion

Calkins v. City of Fruitland

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1975No. 11816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm. Plaintiff complained of alleged damages resulting in December of 1972 from the alleged failure of the defendant-respondent to properly operate its municipal water system. The complaint was filed on the 10th day of December 1974. The only question posed is whether the notice of claim requirements of I.C. § 50-219 and the Idaho Tort Claims Act, I.C. §§ 6-903, 906 and 908 require affirmance of the trial court’s order of dismissal.

Appellant’s principal argument, as expressed in its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. CallisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Chase v. RieveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McQuillen v. City of AmmonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Blass v. County of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Brown v. City of CaldwellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
  4. McQuillen v. City of AmmonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API