Werner v. Graley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick District Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion herein, filed December 8, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
M. Y. Graley brought this action to recover the possession of a set of tinner’s tools, stock, and some manufactured tinware, from Rosa Werner and Emil Werner. For some time Graley had occupied a portion of the storeroom of Kearney & Parsons, who had a stock of hardware, in Wichita. They executed a chattel mortgage on their stock of hardware to Rosa Werner, to secure a debt of $3,000 which they owed to her. Afterward, she, by her husband and agent, Emil Werner, took possession of the stock of hardware under the chattel mortgage, and at the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Beard v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Reeves & Co. v. BascueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Sansone v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Edwards v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903