Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Bricker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1903No. 12,457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Chautauqua district court; 0. W. Shinn, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*242The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Smith, J. :

One Goldstein brought an action of replevin in the district court against George T. Edwards for the recovery of a lot of clothing and underwear, alleged to be worth $274. The property was seized under the replevin writ and delivered to the plaintiff, who thereafter dismissed his suit without prejudice. This was an action brought by Edwards on the replevin bond against the defendant in error, a surety for Goldstein, for the value of the goods taken and for damages for their detention. There were verdict and judgment against the bondsman for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Werner v. GraleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warner v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API