Freiheit v. Broch
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Wheeler,
C. J. The defendant leased in writing certain premises to the plaintiff, and one of the covenants of the lease provided: “And the said party of the first part [William Broch, defendant] covenants with said party of the second part [Joseph Freiheit, plaintiff] that at the expiration of said lease that he will renew the same with said party of the second part for a period of five (5) years . . .; provided that said party of the second part shall give thirty (30) days notice, in writing, to said party of the first part of his intention to take said five (5) years renewal of said lease.”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Trull v. . GrangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Dodds v. . HakesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Carrano v. ShoorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Ackerman v. LoforeseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Blanck v. Kimland Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.