Legal Opinion
Blanck v. Kimland Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 8, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
By a writing of May 14th, 1935, the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, leased to the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, “for the balance of this year 1935,” property in West Haven designated as Newt’s Bingo Stand where an amusement park concession had been operated. The plaintiff took possession and paid the rent for 1935, $100 on the signing of the agreement and the final instalment of $150 on August 5th, 1935. The agreement contained the following provision: “It is also understood that Mr. Joseph Blanck has the privilege of renewing this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Quinn v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Carrano v. ShoorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- City Coal Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Didriksen v. HavensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Seven Fifty Main Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. SpectorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Corthouts v. Connecticut Fire Safety Services Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.