Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Judd
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 26, 1965No. 20981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schauer
Pursuant to the request of the Department of Zoning Administration of the City and County of Denver, Colorado, the City Attorney of Denver, on May 16, 1963, forwarded to the City Council a bill for an ordinance changing the zoning classification from R-2 to R-4 of an area described as follows:
“Block Eight (8) Honeymoon Manor Subdivision and the East 500.3 ft. of the SE1^ of the NE% of the NE% of Section 29; Township 3 South Range 67 West of the 6th P. M.”
This bill was designated as Councilman’s Bill No. 223, and was referred to during Council proceedings as C. B. 223. It was introduced in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kitty v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunphy v. City Council of City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- L.C. Canyon Partners, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Oliveira v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Sutphin v. MourningColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bentley v. Valco, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.