Legal Opinion

Kitty v. City of Springfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Three residents of Spring-field seek (1) a declaration whether Springfield’s zoning ordinance has been validly amended to rezone certain land, and (2) an injunction to prevent the building commissioner from issuing a permit to build a multiple dwelling. This dwelling would not comply with the zoning ordinance if the amendment is invalid. The case was referred to a master, whose report was confirmed. By final decree the bill was dismissed. The plaintiffs appealed.

Upon the issue 2 whether the amendment was properly adopted, the master found the following facts. The city council consists of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. DAL MASO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  3. Nevins v. City Council of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Board of Health of Woburn v. SousaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Coleman v. LouisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Hallenborg v. Town Clerk of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Town of Canton v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Noonan v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Anderson v. JuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API