Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis v. District Court of Tulsa County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1928No. 19068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an original action wherein is sought a writ of prohibition against the district court of Tulsa county and the respondent R. D. Hudson, a judge thereof, to stay the further consideration of an action in equity and the enforcement of a temporary injunction issued by respondent in cause No. 40855 in the said district court.

The temporary injunction complained of restrains petitioners, duly licensed attorneys of this state, from further prosecuting an action at law for alleged personal injuries styled “Stewart B. AVare v. Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co.,” numbered 3907, and filed in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. American Express Co. v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kincannon v. PughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Superior Court, Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Rose v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Finley v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Redcorn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Dannenburg v. DannenburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API