Legal Opinion

Kincannon v. Pugh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 17154PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhedps, J.

This is an original action commenced in this court by W. W. Kincan-non, W. H. Johnson, and B. G. Springer, members of and constituting the district school board of consolidated school district No. 21, Stephens county, Okla., against M. W. Pugh, district judge of Stephens county, for a writ of prohibition restraining and enjoining him, as such district judge, from proceeding or assuming jurisdiction in an action pending in said court, numbered 6201 and entitled “W. T. Logan v. Herby Johnson and Whit Kincannon,” the facts being substantially as follows:

W. T. Logan was one of the teachers and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. School Dist. No. 94, Grant Co. v. GautierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. State v. Breckenridge, Superior JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. School Dist. No. 18 of Creek County v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. State Ex Rel. Davis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harris v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Schofield v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Hogan v. Superior Court of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Jackson v. HaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Pine v. Superior Court of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API