Legal Opinion
M.A.K. v. Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2001No. 90527 RelPublished
1Opinion of the Court 1
Docket No. 90527–Agenda 28–May 2001.
M.A.K., Appellee, v. RUSH-PRESBYTERIAN-ST.-LUKE’S MEDICAL CENTER, d/b/a Rush Behavioral Health
Center–Du Page, Appellant.
Opinion filed December 20, 2001.
2Opinion of the Court · GarmanJustice Garman
Plaintiff, M.A.K., filed a complaint in the circuit court of Will County against defendants, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center (Rush) and Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company (Royal), alleging that Rush had improperly released certain medical records to Royal, pursuant to a written consent signed by plaintiff. The circuit court granted judgment on the pleadings to Rush. Thereafter, plaintiff…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrochuIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Paris v. FederIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Texaco-Cities Service Pipeline Co. v. McGawIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Doe v. BroderickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.