Legal Opinion
Doe v. Broderick
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2000No. 99-1893, 99-1894PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge:
John Doe brought an action against Detective Garrett G. Broderick, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp 1998), alleging that Detective Broderick violated Doe’s rights under the Fourth Amendment and under federal statutory law when Detective Broderick, without probable cause, entered the file room of a substance abuse treatment clinic and searched Doe’s confidential treatment records along with numerous other patients’ records. Doe also sought to impose municipal liability upon Fairfax County, Detective Broderick’s employer. The district court denied Detective…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Reedy v. EvansonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Lisa Amaechi v. Matthew West, and Bernard R. Pfluger Town of DumfriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Owens ex rel. Owens v. LottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Knussman v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- J. Gilliam v. Kenneth SealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.