Legal Opinion

Lee Bros. v. Fleishbein

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 6, 1934No. 5127Published

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Determination of this appeal turns upon e®ect must give to the facts which are herewith- briefly stated:

Beginning in 1926 appellant executed its several notes (which ran for three months) to the bank. They were renewed every three months (twenty-three times in all) by taking UP tIle notes when they became due and exccuring new ones Appellee purchased one of thfe notes a?d t°ok » new °ne when a due note was paid. Appellant did not know that its notes had passed out of the possession of the bank.

0n 25> 1931> &e note sued upon was executed. Like its predecessors it ran “to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. First National Bank of Seattle v. HessellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Springfield National Bank v. JeffersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Cheshire Provident Institution v. FeusnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API