Lee Bros. v. Fleishbein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Determination of this appeal turns upon e®ect must give to the facts which are herewith- briefly stated:
Beginning in 1926 appellant executed its several notes (which ran for three months) to the bank. They were renewed every three months (twenty-three times in all) by taking UP tIle notes when they became due and exccuring new ones Appellee purchased one of thfe notes a?d t°ok » new °ne when a due note was paid. Appellant did not know that its notes had passed out of the possession of the bank.
0n 25> 1931> &e note sued upon was executed. Like its predecessors it ran “to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- First National Bank of Seattle v. HessellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Springfield National Bank v. JeffersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Cheshire Provident Institution v. FeusnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.