Springfield National Bank v. Jeffers

The note sued upon in this action is practically *250identical with that dealt with in City National Bank v. Adams, ante, page 239, decided this day. We, therefore, need not discuss whether it is rendered nonnegotiable by the provisions which it contains with regard to collateral security. It is negotiable. The material question here presented is whether the case should have been submitted to the jury on the issue of payment. The exceptions to the admission of evidence have not been argued and we treat them as waived.

There was evidence that the note was given for value on July 3, 1925, by the…