Legal Opinion

Mead v. United States (In Re Mead)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 28, 2007No. Bankruptcy No. 05-13930, Adversary No. 06-14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JERRY A. FUNK, Bankruptcy Judge.

This proceeding came before the upon Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). Partners Trust Bank, Financial Federal Credit, Inc., the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, and the New York Environmental Protection and Spill Compensation Fund (the “New York Oil Spill Fund”) filed responses in opposition to the Motion. Upon the pleadings and the arguments of the parties, the Court finds it appropriate to grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs Motion…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The CADLE CO. II, INC. v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re EganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API