Legal Opinion
Oryszak v. Sullivan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1141 (JDB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sarah Oryszak seeks judicial review of the Secret Service’s revocation of her top secret security clearance pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702. Defendant Mark Sullivan, Director of the United States Secret Service (“the Director”), moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Upon careful consideration, the Court will grant the Director’s motion to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oryszak v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Palmieri v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Oryszak v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009