Schwartz v. Goldin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff sought to evict defendant from a property owned by plaintiff. In an action in ejectment judgment was entered against defendant by virtue of the authority contained in a written lease. Defendant presented to the court below a petition to strike off the judgment; a rule was issued thereon. The court below discharged the rule, and defendant has appealed.
The lease providing for an amicable action in ejectment contained the following provision: “. . . all of which proceedings shall be without right to the party defendant to have an appeal, certiorari, writ of error, exception,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rome Sales & Service Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Casnoff Et Ux. v. GeddesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Cohen v. Brister (Et Ux.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peterson v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Kazanjian v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Carmichaels Motor Sales v. Packrall, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1956
- Northchester Corp. v. Soto, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Schwartz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1949