Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Goldin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1947No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sought to evict defendant from a property owned by plaintiff. In an action in ejectment judgment was entered against defendant by virtue of the authority contained in a written lease. Defendant presented to the court below a petition to strike off the judgment; a rule was issued thereon. The court below discharged the rule, and defendant has appealed.

The lease providing for an amicable action in ejectment contained the following provision: “. . . all of which proceedings shall be without right to the party defendant to have an appeal, certiorari, writ of error, exception,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rome Sales & Service Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Casnoff Et Ux. v. GeddesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Cohen v. Brister (Et Ux.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kazanjian v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Carmichaels Motor Sales v. Packrall, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1956
  4. Northchester Corp. v. Soto, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972
  5. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Schwartz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API