Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Brister (Et Ux.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1947No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Judgment in ejectment, by confession under a warrant of attorney contained in a lease, was entered against defendants in the court below. The court refused to strike off the judgment, and the surviving defendant has appealed, assigning such action as error.

The warrant upon which the judgment was confessed contained the following: “. . . and the lessee hereby releases to the lessor all errors and defects whatsoever in entering such action or judgment, or causing such writ of habere facias possessionem to be issued, or in any proceeding thereon or concerning the same; and hereby…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Altoona Trust Co. v. FocklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Inland Collieries Co. v. VegesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. GoldinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Northchester Corp. v. Soto, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API