Legal Opinion

Burlew v. Hepps

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter originated as a bill for specific performance. It was heard by former Vice-Chancellor Lewis whose opinion is reported in 138 N.J. Eq. 425. The contract contained a provision making the obligation of the complainant to complete the purchase contingent upon his securing a mortgage. The Vice-Chancellor in his opinion denied specific performance upon the ground that the contract lacked mutuality. Before a decree was advised and filed the Vice-Chancellor retired.

Thereafter, in the case of Gottlaub v. Cohen, 139 N.J. Eq. 323, Vice-Chancellor Bigelow had before him a similar situation.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gottlaub v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Burlew v. HeppsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Miner v. Bobinis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API