Legal Opinion

Burlew v. Hepps

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1946No. Docket 148/560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for specific performance, brought by the vendees of a parcel of real estate. A memorandum was signed setting forth the description of the property, the purchase price, and the terms of sale. It provided that a contract was to be executed at a later date, when an additional $300 was to be paid, besides a like sum paid as a deposit on the memorandum. The memorandum contained a provision that "This deposit of Three Hundred Dollars ($300) is made subject to the purchaser procuring a first mortgage of Four Thousand ($4,000)." Defendant refused to convey, and tendered back the check…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fiedler, Inc. v. Coast Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  2. Monahan v. McElligottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Gottlaub v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  3. Horton v. HortonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Burlew v. HeppsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Miner v. Bobinis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API