Legal Opinion
Pedraza v. Coca-Cola Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 29, 2006No. 1:05-cv-01256PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EVANS, District Judge.
This is a putative class action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., in which Plaintiff seeks damages and equitable relief for Defendants’ breach of fiduciary duty (a) in using Coca-Cola stock in Coca-Cola’s Thrift and Investment Plan, and (b) in providing incomplete and misleading information regarding certain business affairs of the Coca-Cola Company to participants in the Thrift and Investment Plan. The case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Morrison v. Moneygram International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.