Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Moneygram International, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 25, 2009No. 08-CV-1121 (PJS/JJG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Delilah Morrison and Sherri Arguello invested in a retirement plan (“the Plan”) sponsored by their former employer, defendant MoneyGram International, Inc. (“MoneyGram”) and established pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against various Plan fiduciaries, including MoneyGram itself, the MoneyGram International Inc. Pension and 401(k) Committee (“the Committee”), and various named and unnamed corporate officers and directors. Plaintiffs allege…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- In re Target Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third BancorpDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- In re Wells Fargo Erisa 401(K) Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Vigeant v. MeekDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.