Legal Opinion
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 2014No. A12-1691PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Cedrick Scott Ince was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous person pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 25BB.185 (2012).1 The petition for civil commitment was filed 1 day before Ince’s release from the Minnesota correctional facility where he had served a sentence imposed following a guilty plea to third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Ince appealed his commitment, arguing that respondent Sibley County failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is “likely to engage in acts of harmful sexual conduct” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 253B.02, subd.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Karsjens v. JessonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICERCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Darrin Rick v. Jodi HarpsteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, (A15-1445).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.