Legal Opinion

Karsjens v. Jesson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2015No. Civil No. 11-3659 (DWF/JJK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case challenges the constitutionality of the statutes governing civil commitment and treatment of sex offenders in Minnesota as written and as applied, and in so doing, challenges the boundaries that we the people set on the notions of individual liberty and freedom, the bedrock principles embedded in the United States Constitution. As has been long recognized, the government may involuntarily detain an individual outside of the criminal justice system through the so-called “civil commitment”…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Michael Hughes v. James DimasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Todd Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  3. Van Orden v. SchaferDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
  4. Van Orden v. StringerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017
  5. Allan v. LudemanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API