Legal Opinion

Jeandell v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1976No. 236, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The appellant, Philip Asay Jeandell, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Kent County by a jury, presided over by Judge George B. Rasin, of breaking and entering a storehouse and related offenses. Upon this appeal, he raises the single contention that the evidence was not legally sufficient to permit the case to go to the jury. That sufficiency question, in turn, revolves around whether two State’s witnesses, Albert Williams and Michael Bell, were accomplices and whether, if that be so, their testimony was corroborated.

In terms of corpus delicti, it was established that the Eastern Shore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Early v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Holt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Ham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Spies v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Kitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Govostis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Samuels v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Proctor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API