Quaintance v. Goodrow
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from Fifth Judicial District, Jefferson County. Action on a promissory note. Plaintiff had judgment below. Motion of defendant King for a new trial was denied by Showers, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, C. J.
This is an action on a promissory note. On the 17th day of June, 1892, Moses Goodrow executed his promissory note to plaintiff for the sum of §750, with interest payable six months after date. Defendant King indorsed the note at the date of its execution. The note was not paid at maturity, and this suit was brought for its collection.
The defendant King alleges as a defense that the plaintiff did not demand the payment of the note, at maturity, of the maker; that the note was not protested for nonpayment; and that he was not in any manner notified of the nonpayment *377thereof. The complaint…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheldon v. HortonNew York Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Badger Coal & Coke Co. v. Sterling Midland Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Inge v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925