Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Albert
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1942PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The defendant, a municipal officer of Springfield, has been found guilty by a judge of violating G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 268, § 8. The indictment charged that he “did corruptly request a gift or gratuity or a promise to make a gift or to do an act beneficial to him under an agreement or with an understanding that his vote” would be given in a particular manner upon a matter that was then or would be brought before him in his official capacity. The defendant appealed from the finding of guilty and the case is here with a transcript of the evidence, a summary of the record, and assignments of error…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Dolan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. CroftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. RandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.