Continental Casualty Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding to forfeit a bail ■bond because of the non-appearance of the defendant. The defense is that defendant’s earlier leaving of the United 'States with the permission of the court was without the knowledge and assent •of the surety. If true, this is a valid defense. Reese v. United States, 1869, 9 Wall. 13, 76 U.S. 13, 19 L.Ed. 541; United States v. Vendetti, D.C.D.Mass., 1940, 33 F.Supp. 34. The court found “the facts against the surety, which now appeals. The sole basis of the appeal is that the evidence did not warrant the finding.
The evidence at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- United States v. VendettiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Irving M. Levin, Etc. v. David R. BerleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. John Wesley Egan and Bryan John Hill, and Stuyvesant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Jesus Galvez-Uriarte, Bert F. Sparacino, D.B.A., Bert's Bail Bonds, Real Party in Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.