Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Galvez-Uriarte, Bert F. Sparacino, D.B.A., Bert's Bail Bonds, Real Party in Interest-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1983No. 81-5341PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Sparacino, a bail bondsman, appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a bail bond forfeiture. We reverse, in part, because the United States increased the risk of the bail bondsman without notice and consent.

Jesus Galvez-Uriarte was charged with violations of federal narcotics laws. He was released pending trial when Sparacino, as agent for Allied Fidelity Insurance Company, filed a $75,000 corporate surety bond. The bond provided that Galvez could not leave California without permission of the court.

Galvez is a citizen of Mexico. When he was released from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford & Sons Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. American Bankers Insurance Company Of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. People v. Western InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. United States v. LePicardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. AguilarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API